msgbartop
A blog about random thoughts
msgbarbottom

05 Nov 09 Useless Feedback

The world is Web2.0 business is full of a single most frustrating statement – I know how to build but how do I sell? While a lot can be said about putting the product in front of your customer and test test test. One aspect of such tests is forgotten more often than now – proper feedback and what to take from it.

Feedback from your potential customer is very important. Which is why we have a crazy number of market research companies and people spending a lot of time finishing and polishing business plans. There are a huge number of people sending out surveys – right from large brands to the tinniest of start ups. I have been flooded with some of these surveys lately and on a close inspection most of them make no sense at all. Almost all questions are about – Would you like this x feature in the product? Do you value x feature in the product? Which of the features is most important to you? etc etc … But the most important question – “Do you need or value this product or service?” rarely ever gets asked.

This reminds me of a survey from someone wanting to start a a Pizza store in Germany. All questions pertained to “What sausage would you like on your pizza?” And they went away excited at what people wanted and started the store only to see nobody buying the pizzas. Who would want a pizza with sausages anyway? So they asked the wrong questions. The first questions should have been – Would you like sausages in your pizza?

To top it all – the most stoopid surveys are for women – trying to gauge their likes and dislikes in technology products. Always starting from the wrong end of things (colour matching a favourite) and patronising. Now will you get a correct feedback with that? No wonder none of them understand women customers.

Tags: , , , , ,

09 Aug 09 A Day at Tomorrow’s Web 09

I spent the whole day yesterday with some amazing people at Tommorow’s Web, a conference by young minds to discuss the future of Internet and Technology industry. It brought together young technology entrepreneurs giving their unique perspective on the Internet and future technologies. An excellent event put together by Grant Bell and Rob Day. The best part was no one of my age (oh shut up!!) was allowed to speak on stage :) .

I shall refrain from calling all those I met yesterday as “young ‘uns” and call them “smart minds” as the presentations they gave were well above what I have heard many grown ups give. The quality of talks and content was well beyond my expectations. The talks ranged from well thought out, grounded and brilliant advice to freelancers from Anna Debenham to in-depth technical discussion on opening the web with a lot of API love by Jamie Rumbelow. A very confident and love your work from Nick Pellant to very sound design and user experience discussion by Greg Cooper. Not to be left behind a very well thought out business plan for Giglocator by James Proud. Meaghan Fitzgerald and Anna Debenham have covered the happenings at the conference.

While I loved being at the event reminiscing what I did when I was 16 years old – all I could think about was debating on political issues and concentrating on getting to a good university. Growing up in India in a high pressured environment where the T-shirts one wears was more important than how smart you are, there was no choice. Hence I think in some way I see the conference as liberation of the youth – allowed to do what they feel is right. Probably also because this is a choice these young entrepreneurs make and have little to fear of failure.

While I think the liberation of the youth and doing what one loves to do is a right thing as I always tell myself and any passionate entrepreneur, I fear for some of these smart minds as I think a lot of them do not have a “Plan B”. Perhaps I am being cynical, perhaps I am being practical or maybe plain insane. But the emphasis on going to university is what I grew up with and this is still the main driver in the east and in the US. While there is a lot of talk about how universities are failing the youth, not keeping up with the changes in technology, society, expectations etc – I think it’s these smart minds who will drive the change. And keeping them out of university is a “Bad Idea”. So is this “liberation of the youth” really right?

While I loved what a lot of them are doing – I think some of them are not really sustainable businesses over a longer term and some will fail. Some of these smart ones have never ever failed and I would hope they never do but having a plan B will make them more prepared and something to fall back on. I agree with James Dyson that what UK needs is more people going to university to study science and engineering and spend time learning things in depth – this is key to a sustainable UK economy.

I don’t mean to discourage any of the smart minds I met yesterday. I only think their potential is huge and needs to be nurtured and they need to have a plan B. And I think going to university is a key to that. I am by no means being a pessimist – I am an optimist and I think these smart ones have a great future.

On another note – where were BBC, Nesta, VC’s and other organisations who talk about future of UK’s technology scene but not around to cover such a promising event?

Tags: , , , , , , ,

28 Jul 09 Adoption vs Retention

A lot of business plans we see are a technology push where we have a technology in search of a problem and customer. The way to build a business and put together a business plan is to detail a customer problem/pain and look for possible solutions. Any solution found should have a way to acquire and retain customers. Also such a solution should if possible ride on an existing related growing solution to a customer problem and customer retention solutions. Once you retain customers business models to monetize will follow.

At the heart most business plans is customer adoption and not customer retention. Entrepreneurs and investors alike do not understand how behaviors change after adoption. Social networks, e-commerce portals and other internet portals are typical examples of businesses where entrepreneurs need to be able to come up with plans for keeping up with growth in customer adoption which can move from being linear to exponential very quickly. One needs to come up with scenarios and lead indicators to see which behaviors are being enacted to then bring in actions to grow further, lead and win in the market. Adoption does not guarantee winning it guarantees survival, retention guarantees us a win. It’s a theme even investor’s overlook while funding companies.

Amazon.com is one of the best examples of successful customer adoption, retention and continuous change and adaption to keep retention up while understanding how to react to exponential growth from a very linear growth pattern. This is still a challenge for Twitter and Facebook while retention is still up we will need to see what new innovative services and products they come up with to maintain this retention while keeping growth high so monetization can follow . Friends Reunited is an example of good customer adoption which then did not keep up the innovation in bringing new ways to retain customers and got stuck in ways to make money without understanding how to retain customers while the likes of Facebook, Bebo and Myspace too over most of their regular customers.  While all above is known fact – the issue I am trying to point out is that most such companies have no plan to understand indicators of exponential growth and no plan to understand how customer retention is important. There is a need also to understand that customer retention comes from not being stagnant but by keeping innovation up and bringing in new products and services regularly. Is it any surprise that Bebo and Myspace will keep seeing retention numbers go down?

Tags: , , , ,

20 Jul 09 So who is your customer champion?

There is a pattern of how founders of internet and media companies think. The traditional way in which founders think of a start-up is – have an idea, raise some money, develop product, release alpha and beta and then get the first customer. This has been the product development model that has been followed by most of us. But why is it then that while all follow the above model some start-ups are successful while others are not? What is the difference between companies doing all of the above in the model? Is there any way to predict success or failure? Is there any way to reduce risk in early stage companies?

Some patterns keep coming up in early stage companies. Most entrepreneurs (founders and CEO’s) are focused on one thing – Getting to launch and getting the first customer. That is the single-minded drive for engineering, the management and the board. Another pattern is that such companies hire sales, marketing and business development staff based on the product development cycle/process as above. Around alpha/beta stage companies start hiring marketing, sales, get ready for launch, hire ad agency, blog, hold launch events etc.

When a start-up gets its product to beta the entire company parties. Who is done at this stage? Marketing? Business development? Sales? Only people who are done are engineering. Most start-ups have no way of managing the risk of getting the market and customers right. Why is it that we have tonnes of methodologies to measure and to help us get the products right but no methodologies to help us get the stuff about our customers and market right?

Start-ups use the tools from product management companies that have come up with lots of tools on how to manage technology risk but have almost no tools to manage customer and market risks.

Most often start-ups think of themselves as a junior version of a large company. The tools and processes for business development, sales and marketing in a large company are not transferable to a small company. So the assumption that expanding the sales team will increase the sales in fixed increments is false. What start-ups need is a customer champion as their sales, marketing and business development equivalents. A customer champion says we do not know who our customers are and we need to go out there and find them.

A customer champion needs to do three things

  • Customer creation and Company building

Customer creation is all about how do we create demand for our companies’ products and services? Any type of talking about your company is not done over day one or even when the product is built – on techcrunch kind of blogs. You hypothesis about – What your company is about, what services you are offering, pricing – will be radically different after you have some contact with your customers. Any press you get as a part of your company has to be part of a strategy and not a random tactic. Typically after you have understood what business you are in, who your customers are, and how you need to scale demand for your company.

Entrepreneurs are usually good at finding opportunities and building something from scratch but not at growing something repeatable. What a customer champion needs to be good at is running a “lean start-up” which combines customer development with agile methodologies for internal development and very quickly iterate its customers feedback and massive number of releases in a day/week.

  • Customer Discovery

Listen to your customer – you might be selling something but you need to listen to what your customers actually want. To find out if customers like your idea/product or not is not an outsourcable problem – the founders need to do this. Particularly the people capable of changing strategy need to be the ones securing good news and bad news.

  • Customer Validation

Customer feedback sometimes requires you to reengineer the product. And this requires engineering in as a partner to do so. But you only want to do that when you are convinced that you understand enough about the customer and market so you are not just tweaking it for random customers.

In early stage ventures – Just passion, agility, personal skills of the entrepreneur etc is not enough you need logic and ask yourself one question every morning and evening – how do I keep reducing the risks. This will in effect lead to a tailored customer development process unique to each start-up and thus a customer creation methodology. The job of a CEO is risk reduction at each and every stage till he/she makes an exit. In my personal opinion the founder should leave the job of a CEO as soon as possible and become the biggest customer champion of his company.

Tags: , ,