<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>@chirdeep &#187; Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chirdeepchhabra.com/category/search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chirdeepchhabra.com</link>
	<description>A blog about random thoughts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 22:53:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Real-Time vs Delay Tolerant search &#8211; I</title>
		<link>http://www.chirdeepchhabra.com/2009/09/real-time-vs-delay-tolerant-search-i/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chirdeepchhabra.com/2009/09/real-time-vs-delay-tolerant-search-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chirdeep Singh Chhabra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[entrepreneurship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[start-up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delay tolerant search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real-time search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chirdeepchhabra.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a rush towards real-time search spurred by the likes of Twitter, Facebook, FriendFeed, Google (Google Wave), Microsoft (through investment in FaceBook) etc. While I can understand why the likes of Thompson-Reuters, AP etc would like to be in real-time search, it is hard to say what the future holds for others. Will our [...]<p><a href="http://www.chirdeepchhabra.com/2009/09/real-time-vs-delay-tolerant-search-i/">Real-Time vs Delay Tolerant search &#8211; I</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.chirdeepchhabra.com">@chirdeep</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chirdeepchhabra.com%2F2009%2F09%2Freal-time-vs-delay-tolerant-search-i%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.chirdeepchhabra.com%2F2009%2F09%2Freal-time-vs-delay-tolerant-search-i%2F&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>There is a rush towards real-time search spurred by the likes of Twitter, Facebook, FriendFeed, Google (Google Wave), Microsoft (through investment in FaceBook) etc. While I can understand why the likes of <a href="http://thomsonreuters.com/" target="_blank">Thompson-Reuters</a>, AP etc would like to be in real-time search, it is hard to say what the future holds for others. Will our appetite for real-time search take over most parts of our internet search? Am I interested in news about M&amp;A, investments, politics, economics, business, disasters etc in real-time? While I get the news, I am more interested in analysis and so is rest of the population (IMHO). So while the main <a href="http://venturebeat.com/2009/06/20/who-rules-real-time-search-a-look-at-9-contenders/" target="_self">real-time search contenders </a>cannot gain more than getting us news at the earliest and impact a small part of our appetite for information, they do little to give us insight, informed choice and educate us little about issues we know and understand less.</p>
<p>I am interested in news but more in analysis, I would like to know which bank failed but also why and on deeper analysis of how. I would like to buy a product with a good deal of information about it along with some good analysis but not just be the first to know about it&#8217;s release. So while real-time search does well on information now &#8211; it is more concerned with news and little else. I would for example want to know what is reason or affects of certain economic, political or social issue which has little to do with real-time search. Also when I look at some real world actions like the best deal for a ticket to NYC . Can I do without going on multiple real-time search (inc Google, Bing etc) and comparison sites for days and get some informed choice? I think there is an opportunity for what I call &#8220;Delay Tolerant Search&#8221; which in my opinion solves bigger problems and I think we have a great appetite for solutions around this. This holds true for some of our daily actions on the internet and quality of articles &#8211; which is why Rupert Murdoch is leading the effort to get people to pay for great content.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chirdeepchhabra.com/2009/09/real-time-vs-delay-tolerant-search-i/">Real-Time vs Delay Tolerant search &#8211; I</a> is a post from: <a href="http://www.chirdeepchhabra.com">@chirdeep</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chirdeepchhabra.com/2009/09/real-time-vs-delay-tolerant-search-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

